Hot Topics

Noteworthy

"[L]abour union lobbies and their political friends have decided that the ideal defence against competition from the poor countries is to raise their cost of production by forcing their standards up, claiming that competition with countries with lower standards is “unfair”. “Free but fair trade” becomes an exercise in insidious protectionism that few recognise as such."
Jagdish Bhagwati,
"Obama and Trade: An Alarm Sounds," Financial Times. January 9, 2009.

NEW Trade Policy Analysis

April 28, 2009
Trade Policy Analysis no. 39

Audaciously Hopeful: How President Obama Can Help Restore the Pro-Trade Consensus

by Daniel J. Ikenson and Scott Lincicome

Daniel Ikenson is associate director of the Center for Trade Policy Studies. He is coauthor of
Antidumping Exposed: The Devilish Details of Unfair Trade Law (Cato Institute, 2003).
Scott Lincicome is an international trade attorney with the law firm of White & Case, LLP, in Washington, D.C.

Executive Summary

There is reason for grave concern about the direction of U.S. trade policy. The bipartisan, pro-trade consensus that served U.S. economic and diplomatic interests so well for so long collapsed during the final two years of the Bush administration. Trade skeptics have increased their ranks in the new Congress, a majority of Americans perceive trade as threatening, and grim economic news has made the political climate inhospitable to arguments in support of trade.

But restoring the pro-trade consensus must be a priority of the Obama administration. If the United States indulges misplaced fears, restrains economic freedoms, and attempts to retreat from the global economy, the country will suffer slower economic growth and have greater difficulty facing future economic and foreign policy challenges.

America's trade skepticism is largely the product of a top-down process. Perceptions have been shaped overwhelmingly by relentless political rhetoric that relies on three myths. Congress and the media have spoken for years about the decline of U.S. manufacturing as though it were fact, when the overwhelming evidence points to a sector that, until the onset of the current recession, was robust and setting performance records. Both lament the U.S. trade deficit without attempting to convey or even understand its causes, meaning, or implications. And both attribute these alleged failures of policy to lax enforcement of existing trade agreements.

President Obama should reexamine these premises. He will find that they are long on fallacy and short on fact. Meanwhile, the president will find it necessary to rein in the congressional leadership's increasingly provocative approach to trade policy if he is to have success repairing America's foreign policy credibility.

The determination of the president to arrest and reverse America's misguided and metastasizing aversion to trade could dramatically improve prospects for restoring the pro-trade consensus.


Text of Trade Policy Analysis No. 39 (PDF, 40 pgs, 914 kb)



New Book

Mad about Trade: Why Main Street America Should Embrace Globalization

Commentary

Free Trade Is a Boon to the Environment
by Sallie James
October 8, 2009

Obama's Protectionist Policies Hurting Low-Income Americans
by Daniel Griswold
September 29, 2009

Crash Course in Global Economics
by Daniel J. Ikenson and Alec van Gelder
September 21, 2009

View all

CTPS @ Liberty

Raising an Eyebrow at LaHood's Toyota Remarks
by Daniel Ikenson
February 4, 2010

Change You Can Be Deceived In
by Sallie James
February 3, 2010

Time to Lose the Trade Enforcement Fig Leaf
by Daniel Ikenson
February 2, 2010

View all