"If we increase the number of H-1B visas that are available to U.S. companies, employment of U.S. nationals would likely grow as well. For instance, Microsoft has found that for every H-1B hire we make, we add on average four additional employees to support them in various capacities."
Bill Gates,
Testimony before the Committee on Science and Technology, US House of Representatives,
March 12, 2008.

The U.S. antidumping law, according to its supporters, ensures "fair trade" by offsetting market distortions caused by foreign governments. Specifically, it allegedly targets "unfair" pricing practices--price discrimination and below-cost sales--that reflect protectionism, cartelization, subsidies, and other structural defects in foreign markets.
Years of analysis has proven that there is a disconnect between the rhetoric of antidumping supporters and the reality of antidumping practice. The law as currently written and enforced does not reliably identify price discrimination or below-cost sales.
Furthermore, the law lacks any mechanism for determining whether the pricing practices it condemns as unfair have any connection to market-distorting policies abroad. Although price discrimination and below-cost sales can result from government interventionism, they can also be due to perfectly normal marketplace behavior. Consequently, the antidumping law frequently punishes foreign firms for unexceptionable business practices routinely engaged in by American companies.
| Trade Policy Analysis |
by Daniel Ikenson (October 6, 2005) |
by Dan Ikenson (October 15, 2003) |
by Brink Lindsey and Dan Ikenson (November 26, 2002) |
by Lewis E. Leibowitz (November 6, 2001) |
by Brink Lindsey and Daniel J. Ikenson (July 30, 2001) |
by Brink Lindsey (August 16, 1999) |
| Trade Briefing Papers |
by Daniel Ikenson (March 7, 2005) |
by Daniel Ikenson (June 22, 2004) |
| Speeches and Testimony |
(October 30, 2001) |
| Free Trade Bulletins |
by Daniel Ikenson (September 14, 2006) |
by Daniel Ikenson (October 28, 2005) |
by Daniel Ikenson (June 20, 2005) |
by Dan Ikenson (June 3, 2004) |
by Dan Ikenson (April 27, 2004) |
by Dan Ikenson (January 13, 2004) |
| Commentary |
By Daniel Ikenson (December 9, 2005) |
By Daniel Ikenson (September 9, 2005) |
by Daniel Ikenson (May 19, 2005) |
by Dan Ikenson (September 13, 2004) |
by Dan Ikenson (February 18, 2004) |
by Daniel Ikenson (December 23, 2002) |
by Brink Lindsey and Dan Ikenson (May 10, 2002) |
by Dan Ikenson (October 22, 2001) |
by Dan Ikenson (August 27, 2001) |
by Dan Ikenson (March 7, 2001) |
by Brink Lindsey (November 12, 1999) |
by Aaron Lukas (May 13, 1999) |
by William A. Niskanen (June 24, 1998) |
By Brink Lindsey (June 1, 1998) |
by Aaron Lukas (April 15, 1998) |
by Brink Lindsey (March 11, 1998) |
by Christopher M. Dumler (October 14, 1997) |
by Christopher M. Dumler (October 14, 1997) |
Trade, growth: Weep not for Doha
China's Energy Woes
Trade, They SED
Worried About a Recession? Don't Blame Free Trade
What's Charlie Rangel Hiding?
by Daniel Ikenson
July 23, 2008
Mandelson Does His Bit for Doha
by Sallie James
July 22, 2008
Free Trade Promotes Peace in Colombia
by Daniel Griswold
July 11, 2008
Dumbing Down Trade to Make it Saleable
by Daniel Ikenson
July 10, 2008