Key Trade Issues

Noteworthy

"If we increase the number of H-1B visas that are available to U.S. companies, employment of U.S. nationals would likely grow as well. For instance, Microsoft has found that for every H-1B hire we make, we add on average four additional employees to support them in various capacities."
Bill Gates,
Testimony before the Committee on Science and Technology, US House of Representatives,
March 12, 2008.

Agriculture

Agriculture is one of the most divisive issues in trade today. It is easily the most distorted sector, with high tariffs and, in developed countries at least, large amounts of government subsidies through price supports and direct payments. On the other hand, developing countries, who have a comparative advantage in these products, cannot afford to subsidize their agriculture sector and face prohibitive tariffs for their products abroad. The powerful agriculture lobby groups, particularly in the large developed countries, make reform politically difficult.

This is as true of the United States as it is for that other bogey-man of agricultural trade, the European Union. The U.S. government subsidizes certain farm commodities through direct price supports and tariff rate quotas that limit imports. Americans pay a high price for this ongoing government intervention in agricultural markets: in 2004, U.S. farm programs transferred $16.2 billion from U.S. food consumers to producers.

Congress should seize the opportunity presented by the drafting of a new farm bill in 2007 to fundamentally reshape U.S. agricultural policy in a more market-friendly direction. A farm bill with deep cuts in subsidies and trade barriers would save U.S. taxpayers and consumers tens of billions of dollars during the next decade, would yield environmental benefits by reducing over-production, and stimulate innovation and productivity on farms. Cutting subsidies and trade barriers would also raise incomes of farmers in poorer countries and reduce global poverty, contributing to a more hospitable climate abroad for U.S. foreign policy.


The LATEST from the Center for Trade Policy Studies on Agriculture

  • Free Trade Bulletin no. 31: Food Fight (January 30, 2008)

Scroll DownMORE from the Center for Trade Policy Studies on AgricultureScroll Down


          Trade Policy Analysis

          Trade Briefing Papers

          Speeches and Testimony

          Free Trade Bulletins

          Commentary


      Commentary

      Trade, growth: Weep not for Doha
      by Daniel Ikenson
      July 20, 2008

      China's Energy Woes
      by Daniel Ikenson
      June 30, 2008

      Trade, They SED
      by Daniel Ikenson
      June 18, 2008

      Worried About a Recession? Don't Blame Free Trade
      by Daniel Griswold
      June 3, 2008

      View all

      CTPS @ Liberty

      What's Charlie Rangel Hiding?
      by Daniel Ikenson
      July 23, 2008

      Mandelson Does His Bit for Doha
      by Sallie James
      July 22, 2008

      Free Trade Promotes Peace in Colombia
      by Daniel Griswold
      July 11, 2008

      Dumbing Down Trade to Make it Saleable
      by Daniel Ikenson
      July 10, 2008

      View all